"failure to raise a human being
May. 31st, 2005 10:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I feel like there should be a crime: "failure to raise a human being" such that if you kid does something that shock the conscience (like those in that pack of predators that beat the bum to death on a lark) you have to spend the equivelent of a minor manslaughter charge in jail.
But really, there shouldn't be, we don't need to punish anyone any more in this society than we do now. We need a nanny state for the children in our society, for our own protection. Every child should be assessed as they grow and if they seem to be twisting into something sick we need to take corrective action to try and shape their behavior into something acceptable (and if they can't be reshaped, than simply controlled).
But really, there shouldn't be, we don't need to punish anyone any more in this society than we do now. We need a nanny state for the children in our society, for our own protection. Every child should be assessed as they grow and if they seem to be twisting into something sick we need to take corrective action to try and shape their behavior into something acceptable (and if they can't be reshaped, than simply controlled).
Nope, not going there
Date: 2005-06-01 04:03 am (UTC)Look at it, when was the last time a Pagan-raised kid shot up a school, killed their parents and grandparents on the day of their graduation, or killed a bum for fun.
Punish the parents IF the kid does something but no nanny states, that opens the door too wide for judgement by those who are the least equipped to judge.
And...
Date: 2005-06-01 04:10 am (UTC)Are these kids candidates for future violence according to those who you might put into the place to assess them? Probably, according to the conventional 'wisdom' prevailent in today's uptight ultra-conservative society where zero-tolerance for DRAWING A PICTURE OF A GUN gets you suspended and put into alternative school for a whole year.
Nope, I don't agree at all.
Now, take the non-human dreg that beat the bum to death and let people beat the hell out of him, to within an inch of death, and let him then have to serve mankind in some sort of capacity where he has to help bums and those who are less fortunate (ie: if he was that damned bored, make him so busy he will never be bored again).
I think we cottle these darlings who do this WAY too much. Like what I believe of a child molester, if we catch them, if they are guilty (like we have DNA on them; thus catching them 'red handed'), we don't put them in jail for a few years and let them out to have to be on some "watch" list, we drag them out and execute them. Zero recidivisem. No more kids hurt because there are fewer and fewer pediphiles to pray on them.
But, then again, I would be told that's not too "wiccan" of a thought. Yeah, even I'm not perfect (grin).
Re: And...
Date: 2005-06-01 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 12:42 pm (UTC)Sorry, I'm not buying into this one.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 01:39 pm (UTC)Read the Republic lately?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 01:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 05:46 pm (UTC)I don't believe that (nor do I believe you do really), I think it has an effect, it may not determine what happens ultimately, but it does effect what happens ultimately.
But it's not just about raising, because the parent should have the most contact with the kid they should be resposible for warning society when they've spawned a danger.