Again: there's too much proof regarding any # of posts I've made any number of places that indicate that I'm NOT looking for a fight at all. So, again: I maintain that it has only been with the folks that you mention that there seems to be that kind of behavior that you criticize in your post. So when I say you're "right" it is only with the people you name. How am I looking for a fight by adoring Molasses' wedding dress? How am I looking for a fight by applauding ContentLove's penchant for skepticism when she presents some issues regarding stories of the Hurricane Katrina coverage? How was I looking for a fight when I made my comment about her Target sucks story? How am I looking for a fight when I admire Dave's photos? I could go on and on to offer examples of how you seem to be painting a very broad brush as if every time I have something to say, I'm desiring an argument and that assessment is flat out wrong, Litch. Again: this only relates to problems I've had with Stickcow and Faustian Wish as far as times when I KNOW I was being attacked in a way that seemed to have little or nothing to do with what I had to say, but the fact that I STATED IT. In other words: I guarantee if anyone else had stated it they wouldn't have attacked that person at all. And let's face --- shit got funky toward me with some of your female friends toward me the very moment, I do believe, when you posted some pictures on YOUR BLOG and specifically noted to the world that I had been up at your place. I had made mention of that fact, too by way of telling Gev about how I had accidentally closed your browser once. And then let's face this: My blog, while inactive, has gone no where. So who wasn't made aware of the big fight we had when you put that quiz on your blog that infuriated me and THEN YOU had to post that thing of, "Why is NewBlksusan pissed at me?" And we know what happened in August. . .it's all on both of our blogs for anyone to see whenever it strikes their fancy. Shit, I've often wished I could delete all of it and have tried, but I cannot. I guess the point being we can't "erase" our mistakes when they're all their to see on LJ and so any "proof" of my behavior is there for everyone to see and to know I have only "fought" with three people only since I've been on LJ: you, Stickcow and Faustian Wish. That's IT. So let's be factual and I will accept that. As for looking for drama to distract myself from my life. No: I'm looking for connection. You've always known that about me. There are FAR TOO MANY POSTS FROM ME ON LIVE JOURNAL THAT SUPPORT THAT. No drama from me when I'm discussing an author with Molasses or how she made her dress. No drama from me when I'm telling Dirtstar how I'd like to rip his clothes off. No drama from me when I'm telling Gev about my love of the Mets. So stick to the facts, Litch, please. Don't try to paint me as someone who is stalking LJ "looking for fights" because that's just NOT TRUE. And I refuse to have someone paint me with such a broad stroke of a brush to win this or any argument, OK?
Oh: amendment to previous post. You're right to an extent. . .
How am I looking for a fight by adoring Molasses' wedding dress?
How am I looking for a fight by applauding ContentLove's penchant for skepticism when she presents some issues regarding stories of the Hurricane Katrina coverage?
How was I looking for a fight when I made my comment about her Target sucks story?
How am I looking for a fight when I admire Dave's photos?
I could go on and on to offer examples of how you seem to be painting a very broad brush as if every time I have something to say, I'm desiring an argument and that assessment is flat out wrong, Litch. Again: this only relates to problems I've had with Stickcow and Faustian Wish as far as times when I KNOW I was being attacked in a way that seemed to have little or nothing to do with what I had to say, but the fact that I STATED IT. In other words: I guarantee if anyone else had stated it they wouldn't have attacked that person at all.
And let's face --- shit got funky toward me with some of your female friends toward me the very moment, I do believe, when you posted some pictures on YOUR BLOG and specifically noted to the world that I had been up at your place. I had made mention of that fact, too by way of telling Gev about how I had accidentally closed your browser once.
And then let's face this: My blog, while inactive, has gone no where. So who wasn't made aware of the big fight we had when you put that quiz on your blog that infuriated me and THEN YOU had to post that thing of, "Why is NewBlksusan pissed at me?" And we know what happened in August. . .it's all on both of our blogs for anyone to see whenever it strikes their fancy. Shit, I've often wished I could delete all of it and have tried, but I cannot.
I guess the point being we can't "erase" our mistakes when they're all their to see on LJ and so any "proof" of my behavior is there for everyone to see and to know I have only "fought" with three people only since I've been on LJ: you, Stickcow and Faustian Wish. That's IT.
So let's be factual and I will accept that.
As for looking for drama to distract myself from my life. No: I'm looking for connection. You've always known that about me. There are FAR TOO MANY POSTS FROM ME ON LIVE JOURNAL THAT SUPPORT THAT. No drama from me when I'm discussing an author with Molasses or how she made her dress. No drama from me when I'm telling Dirtstar how I'd like to rip his clothes off. No drama from me when I'm telling Gev about my love of the Mets. So stick to the facts, Litch, please. Don't try to paint me as someone who is stalking LJ "looking for fights" because that's just NOT TRUE.
And I refuse to have someone paint me with such a broad stroke of a brush to win this or any argument, OK?